Advances in Cyber Security: Technology, Operations, and Experiences / D. Frank Hsu
SYSNO 6409266, přírůstkové číslo 6733

Seznam obrázků v dokumentu:
Figure 1. Immersion of the Cyber-Physical-Natural (CPN) ecosystem
Figure 2: Cybersecurity Informatics Framework (CIF) for the CPN cyberspace ecosystem
Figure 1: Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack: (a) Example of a DDoS attack network; (b) DDoS attack flooding a primary victim site.
Figure 2: Bastion hardware-software security architecture
Figure 3: Conventional and minimal trust chains
Figure 1: Web browsing through a Tor circuit.
Figure 2: End-to-end correlation by a single AS observer
Figure 1. Defending software systems against cyber attacks throughout their lifecycle.
Figure 2: ConfigAssure system overview
Figure 3: Visualization of IP network topology noninvasively computed from analysis of router configuration files.
Figure 4. Run-time monitoring and anomaly detection.
Figure 1. Tier 1 provider interconnection model.
Figure 2. Tier 2 provider model.
Figure 3. Traffic flow via transit versus peering.
Figure 4. Traffic via transit not the shortest path.
Figure 5. Symmetrical peering. Peering: Same amount of traffic on both directions
Figure 6. Asymmetrical peering. Peering: Large traffic amount to one direction
Figure 7. Layer 2 IXP architecture.
Figure 8. Layer 3 IXP architecture.
Figure 1. Hypothesized effects on individual centrality.
Figure 2. In- and outdegree distributions for the complete time span on a logarithmic scale.
Figure 3. Visualization of relationships (black line) formed between forum members (red bullets) over the complete time span.
Figure 1. Overview of the life cycle of a medical IT network. Note the alignment of processes to ISO 20000. (Image reprinted by permission from the International Electrotechnical Commission [IEC] from its International Standard IEC 80001-1 ed.1.0 [2010].)
Figure 1. Notable security incidents since 1982
Figure 2. Security market in Japan [3].
Figure 3. Global security market in 2007 [4].
Figure 4: MRC display for risk analysis
Figure 5. Mitigating information leakage.